https://doi.org/10.4081/acbr.2022.200
Intrauterine adhesions, peritubal adhesions and tubal occlusion on hysterosalpingography
Any significant correlations with clinical history of previous pelvic inflammatory disease, dilatation and curettage and other pelvic surgeries among patients with secondary infertility?
Submitted: 31 March 2022
Accepted: 20 June 2022
Published: 9 August 2022
Accepted: 20 June 2022
Abstract Views: 869
PDF: 176
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID), Dilatation and Curettage (D&C) and other abdominopelvic surgeries are often presumed to cause female infertility. This can occur through adhesions formation that can result in Intrauterine Adhesions (IUA), Peritubal Adhesions (PTA) and Tubal Occlusion (TO). Hysterosalpingography (HSG) can be used to diagnose IUA, PTA, and TO; and the correlations of these findings with the histories of PID, D&C and other abdominopelvic surgeries statistically tested. The available literature shows very few of such correlation tests. The objective of this study was to document HSG diagnosis of IUA, PTA and TO, and test their correlation with histories of previous PID, D&C and abdominopelvic surgeries among women with secondary infertility. This is a prospective descriptive study of 158 subjects, analyzed with SPSS version 21. For correlation test, p≤0.05 is considered significant. There was history of previous PID in 53 subjects (33.5%), D&C in 114 (72.2%), and abdominopelvic surgery in 80 (50.6%). The important findings included: IUA in 20 subjects (12.7%), TO in 53 (33.5%) and PTA in 30 (19.0%). Significant correlation was found between D&C and PTA, but not between PID and IUA, PID and TO, PID and PTA, D&C and IUA, D&C and TO, abdominopelvic surgery and IUA, abdominopelvic surgery and TO, or abdominopelvic surgery and PTA. Tubal occlusion, followed by PTA and by IUA were detected in that order as the possible causes of infertility in our subjects; and these did not correlate well with the history of PID, D&C and other abdominopelvic surgeries.
Bhandari S, Bhave P, Ganguly I, et al. Reproductive outcome of patients with Asherman’s syndrome: A SAIMS experience. J Reprod Infertil 2015;16:229-35.
Tan IF, Robertson M. The role of imaging in the investigation of Asherman’s syndrome. AJUM 2011;14:17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2011.tb00118.x
Ahmadi F, Siahbazi S, Akhbari F, et al. Hysterosalpingography finding in intrauterine adhesion (Asherman’s syndrome): A pictorial essay. Int J Fertil Steril 2013;7:155-60.
Friedler S, Margalioth EJ, Kafka I, Yaffe H. Incidence of post-abortion intrauterine adhesions evaluated by hysteroscopy - A prospective study. Hum Reprod 1993;8:442-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138068
Karasick S, Goldfarb AF. Peritubal adhesions in infertile women: Diagnosis with hysterosalpingography. AJR 1989:777-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.152.4.777
Zafarani F, Ghaffari F, Ahmadi F, et al. Hysterosalpingography in the assessment of proximal tubal pathology: A review of congenital and acquired abnormalities. Br J Radiol 2021;94:20201386.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201386
Famurewa O, Adeyemi A, Ibitoye O, Ogunsemoyin O. Association between history of abdominopelvic surgery and tubal pathology. Afr Health Sci 2013;13:441-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v13i2.34
Al-Jaroudi D, Aldughayyim AA, Alshamry WS, et al. Hysterosalpingogram findings among subfertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Int J Womens Health 2018;10:431–6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S156157
Honore G, Holden AE, Schenken RS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril 1999;71:785–95.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00014-X
Brüggmann D, Tchartchian G, Wallwiener M, et al. Intra-abdominal adhesions: Definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010;107:769-75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0769
Gündüz R, Ağaçayak E, Okutucu G, et al. Hysterosalpingography: A potential alternative to laparoscopy in the evaluation of tubal obstruction in infertile patients? Afri Health Sci 2021;21:373.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i1.47
Reddy GS, Jyothi G. Hysterosalpingogram in evaluation of primary and secondary infertility: A two year study at a tertiary care hospital of south India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2019;8:2202-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20192164
Olpin JD, Kennedy A. Secondary infertility in women: Radiologic evaluation. Reports in medical imaging. 2011;4:1-14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMI.S9179
Jimah BB, Gorleku P, Baffour Appiah A. Hysterosalpingography Findings and Jimah Ratio of the Uterine Cavity in Women with Infertility in Central Region, Ghana. Radiol Res Pract 2020;2020:6697653.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6697653
Cates W, Farley TMM, Rowe PJ. Worldwide patterns of infertility: is Africa different? Lancet 1985;326:596-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(85)90594-X
B. O. Botwe, K. Bamfo-Quaicoe, E. Hunu, and S. Anim-Sampong. Hysterosalpingographic findings among ghanaian women undergoing infertility work-up: A study at the Korle-bu teaching hospital. Fertility Res Pract 2015;1:1-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-015-0001-6
Njeze NR, Ezeofor SN. Structural findings of hysterosalpingography in infertile women in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. Int J Med Health Dev 2020;25:96-100.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmh.IJMH_12_20
Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Vallejos J, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of uterus and fallopian tubes in female infertility. Fertil Steril 2016;105:6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.016
Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod 1991;6:811–6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137433
Opsahl MS, Bradley Miller B, Klein TA. The predictive value of hysterosalpingography for tubal and peritoneal infertility factors. Fertil Steril 1993;60:444-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56158-5
Seibel M. Infertility: A comprehensive text. Norwalk (CT): Appleton and Lange, 1990.
Patil M. Assessing Tubal Damage. J Hum Reprod Sci 2009;2:2–11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.51335
Acholonu UC, Silberzweig J, Stein DE, Martin Keltz M. Hysterosalpingography versus sonohysterography for intrauterine abnormalities. J Soc Laparoendosc Surgeons 2011;15:471-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13176785203923
Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Carusotti C, et al. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye pertubation to evaluate tubal patency. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:367–72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60264-2
Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, et al. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001356.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356
Al Subhi T, Al Jashnmi RN, Al Khaduri M, Gowri V. Prevalence of tubal obstruction in the hysterosalpingogram of women with primary and secondary infertility. J Reprod Infertil 2013;14:214-6.
Eze KC, Awosanya GOG, Akhigbe AO. Pattern of uterine and tubal abnormalities in hysterosalpingography of women presenting with infertility at UBTH, Benin. Afr J Med Pharm Sci 2004;8:40-50.
Nwankwo NC, Akani CI. Pattern of hysterosalpingographic findings in infertility in Port Harcourt. West Afr J Radiol 2005;12:15-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/wajr.v12i1.34200
Bello TO. Tubal abnormalities on hsterosalpingographyin primary and secondary infertility. West Afr J Med 2006;25:130-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/wajm.v25i2.28263
Oguntoyinbo AE, Aboyeji AP. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) findings: Of infertile patients in Ilorin. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;29:85564.
Dutta S, Mazumder P, Mishra D, Saha JK. Study on comparative diagnostic efficacy of HSG & laparoscopy in infertility. J Evolution Med Dent Sci 2020;9:937-42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/202
Toufig H, Twfieg ME, Omer H, El-Musharaf T. Evaluation of hysterosalpingographic findings among patients presenting with infertility. Saudi J Bio Sci 2020;27;2876-82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.041
How to Cite
Onuh, A. C., Udobi , S. I., & Aronu , M. E. (2022). Intrauterine adhesions, peritubal adhesions and tubal occlusion on hysterosalpingography: Any significant correlations with clinical history of previous pelvic inflammatory disease, dilatation and curettage and other pelvic surgeries among patients with secondary infertility?. Annals of Clinical and Biomedical Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/acbr.2022.200
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.