https://doi.org/10.4081/pjm.2022.161

Pediatrics ear syringing in a tertiary health institution of a developing country: Our experience

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
Submitted: 21 August 2021
Accepted: 6 December 2021
Published: 28 June 2022
Ear syringing, paediatric, indications, complications, Nigeria
Abstract Views: 235
PDF: 96
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Waheed Atilade Adegbiji
ENT Department, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria.
AbdulAkeem Adebayo Aluko
aaaluko.oto@buk.edu.ng
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3348-5804
ENT Department, Bayero University/Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
Shuaib Kayode Aremu
ENT Department, Federal Teaching Hospital Ido-Ekiti, Ekiti State/Afe-Babalola University Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.

Ear syringing is a common otologic procedure in otorhinolaryngologic practice worldwide. This study aimed at determining the prevalence, indications, contraindications, complications and sources of referral that are associated with ear syringing among children in a tertiary health institution of a developing country. This was a retrospective study of all patients that had ear syringing in the Ear, Nose and Throat department of our center over two years. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 18.0. Statistical significance was set at pvalue ≤0.05. There were 176 (59.9%) male participants with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. The prevalence of ear syringing in children less than 18 years was 9.1%. Main indications for ear syringing were impacted earwax 173 (58.8%), impacted foreign body in the ear 62 (21.1%), fungal debris 41 (13.9%) and dried pus debris (post otitis externa) 15 (5.1%). Unilateral ear syringing 227 (77.2%) was more common than bilateral ear syringing 67 (22.8%), with the right ear syringing done in138 (46.9%). The majority 201 (68.4%) of the earsyringing was done by specialist ENT nurses and 86 (29.3%) by resident doctors. Two hundred and nineteen (74.5%) were performed in outpatient clinics while 67 (22.8%) were in the emergency ward. Relative contra-indications to ear syringing occurred in 184 (62.9%). Some of the contraindications were hard impacted earwax and acute otitis externa in 132 (44.9%) and 42 (14.3%) respectively. Complications occurred in 63 (21.4%) and these were failed procedures in 26 (8.8%), otalgia in 9 (3.1%), and irritating cough 9 (3.1%). The main sources of referral were Family physicians in 82 (27.9%) and Paediatricians in 76 (25.9%). Prevalence of pediatric ear syringing was 9.1%. Common indications are preventable diseases. The procedure appears very simple, but it is associated with some complications.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Farooq M. Comparison of syringing of the Ear Wax with plastic Funding Source: Nil Disposable and Metallic Syringes. JIMDC 2017;6:170-3.
Pothier DD, Hall C, Gillett S. A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic removal of wax: a randomized clinical trial. Clinical Otolaryngol 2006;31:375-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01288.x
Bird S. The potential pitfalls of ear syringing. Minimizing the risks. Australian Family Physician 2003;32:150.
Mitka M. Cerumen removal guidelines wax practical. JAMA 2008;300:1506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.13.1506
Kumar S, Kumar M, Lesser T, Banhegyi G. Foreign bodies in the ear: a simple technique for removal analyzed in vitro. Emerg Med J 2005;22:266-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2004.015016
Coppin R, Wicke D, Little P. Managing earwax in primary care: efficacy of self-treatment using a bulb syringe. Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:44-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X263811
Mandel EM, Dohar JE, Casselbrant ML. Aural irrigation using the OtoClear® Safe Irrigation System in children. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2004;68:1295-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.04.033
Snelling JD, Smithard A, Waddell A. Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series. Clinical Otolaryngol 2009;34:21-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01841.x
Blake P, Matthews R, Hornibrook J. When not to syringe an ear. New Zealand Med J 1998;111:422-4.
The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Clinical practice guidelines issued for managing earwax impaction. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2008;139:S1-S21.
Adegbiji WA,Aremu SK, Aluko AAA, OlubiO. Management of Otological Foreign Bodies Impaction in Tertiary Health Care Center. Int J Innov Res Med Sci 2019;04:97-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol04-i02/543
Dinsdale RC, Roland PS, Manning SC, Meyerhoff WL. Catastrophic otologic injury from oral jet irrigation of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 1991;101:75-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199101000-00014
Bapat U, Nia J, Bance M. Severe audiovestibular loss following ear syringing for wax removal. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:410-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215011907776
Adegbiji WA, Olajide TG, Aluko AA, Eletta AP. Paediatric Otorhinolaryngological, Head and Neck Procedures in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Care Centre. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;2:1037.
Eziyi JAE, Amusa YB, Nwawolo CC, Ezeanolue BC. Wax Impaction in Nigerian School Children. East Central Afr J Surg 2011;16:40-5.
Ogunleye AO, Awobem AA. Trends of ear syringing at Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 2004;33:35-7.
Ogunleye AOA, Sogebi ROA. Otic foreign bodies in children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Nigerian J Surg Res 2005;7:305-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/njsr.v7i3.12303
Fox A, Bartlett P. Nurse-led ear care: training needs and the latest techniques. Prof Nurse 2001;17:256-8.
Adegbiji WA, Alabi BS, Omokanye HK, et al. Clinico-mycological profile of otomycosis in two tertiary health institutions in Nigeria – a prospective study. Port Harcourt Med J 2012;6:258-63.
Blake P, Matthews R, Hornibrook J. When not to syringe an ear. New Zeland Med J 1998;111:422-4.
McCarter DF, Courtney AU, Pollart SM. Cerumen impaction. Am Fam Physician 2007;75:1523-8.
Hegmann T. Removal of cerumen and foreign bodies from the ear. Essential Clinical Procedures E-Book 2013;346.
Caballero M, Navarrete P, Prades E, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of chlorobutanol, potassium carbonate, and irrigation in cerumen removal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009;118:552-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940911800803
Dosemane D, Ganapathi K, Kanthila J. Knowledge, attitude and practice of ear care in Coastal Karnataka. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:MC01–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/15401.6880
Propst EJ, George T, Janjua A, et al. Removal of impacted cerumen in children using an aural irrigation system. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:1840-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.09.014
Thomas AM, Poojary B, Badaridatta HC. Facial nerve palsy as a complication of ear syringing. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:714-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215112000886
Hunt M. Tips for successful ear syringing. Practice Nurse 2005;4:10-1.
Mgbe RB, Umana A, Adekanye AG, OffiongME. Otomycosis - A management challenge in Calabar, SouthSouth Nigeria. Int J Third World Med 2011;9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5580/12c4

How to Cite

Adegbiji, Waheed Atilade, AbdulAkeem Adebayo Aluko, and Shuaib Kayode Aremu. 2022. “Pediatrics Ear Syringing in a Tertiary Health Institution of a Developing Country: Our Experience”. Pyramid Journal of Medicine 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.4081/pjm.2022.161.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.