Impact of family social support on psychological wellbeing of infertile women attending Yusuf Dantsoho Memorial Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria

Published: September 4, 2020
Abstract Views: 89
PDF: 34
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Infertility could be a life crisis with a wide range of socio-cultural and emotional problems. These social consequences are usually not voluntarily disclosed by the affected women and consequently do not receive adequate attention so the women continue to suffer in silence. The study aimed to determine the impact of family social support on psychological well-being of infertile women attending Yusuf Dantsoho Memorial Hospital (YDMH), Kaduna. The study was a cross sectional study conducted at the YDMH, T/Wada, Kaduna. Two hundred and fifty-four women who presented to the gynecology clinic during the study period and consented to participate in the study were recruited consecutively. Data on socio-demographics and family social support were determined using a self-structured questionnaire. Psychological wellbeing was assessed using a General Health Questioner. Data was analyzed using EPI-INFO statistical package. Majority of the participants were Northerners (70.1%), Muslims (91.7%), and Unemployed (52.8%) with an average monthly income of less than N 20,000 (73.6%). Most were within the age group of 25–30 years (40.2%) and from monogamous families (70.1%) with most families having 0–5 children (89.4%). 67.7% of the participants had adequate social support from their husbands as against 32.3% who had inadequate support (such as availability of financial, support encouragement, concern and sense of social belonging). Only 33.5% had adequate social support from their in-laws while majority of them (66.5%) had inadequate social support. A total of 203 (79.9%) of the participants had psychological distress (self-administered questioner) while 51 (20.1%) had no psychological distress. Husbands and in-laws support were significantly related to psychological wellbeing of the infertile women. Adequate social support provided by family members reduces stress, improves psychological wellbeing and quality of life of infertile women.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Mirzayi L, Gharamaleki N.S. Comparing perceived social support and life quality in fertile and infertile women. Int. J.Phys.Beh. Res. 2015; 4(3); 290 – 294.
Erdem K. A sectional study: The relationship between perceived social support and depression in Turkish infertile women. Int. J. Fertil Steril. 2014; 8(2): 303-314.
World Health Organisation (WHO). Prevention of mental disorders. Effective intervention and policy options. 2004 Summary Report. Accessed on 10th April, 2019. Available at URL http://www.who.int.evidence>prevent.
Greil A, Slauson K, Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature. Sociology of health and illness. 2010; 32 (1): 140 – 162.
Mahmoudi M.S, Mirzaian B, Hassanzadeh R. The relationship between social support and anxiety in infertile women. Turkish J. Sci. Res. 2015; 2(4): 87–90.
Fooladvand KH. Effect of social support, academic stress and academic self-efficiency on physical, Psychological health. Contemporary psychology. 2009; 4(2): 81–93.
Qadir F, Khalid A, Medhin G. Social support, marital adjustment and psychological distress among women with primary infertility in Pakistan. Women Health. 2015; 55(4): 432-46.
Khoshbin A, Roshaninejad MD, Sabagh SH, Haghani H. Relationship between loneliness and social support in infertile couples. Journal of Iranian nursing and midwifery. 2000; 13:6.
Dyer SJ, Abraham N, Mokoena NE. Psychological distress among women suffering from infertility in South Africa; A quantitative assessment. Hum Reprod, 2005; 20(7): 1938-1943.
Kus C. Determination of the life quality and perceived social support of women in infertile case. Presented for M. Sc. Istanbul: Marmara University; 2008.
Eren N. The impact of the level of perceived social support in infertile couples on stress related with infertile and marital adjustment. Presented for Ph.D Ankara: Gazi University; 2008.
Goldberg D, Hillier V. A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1979; 9(1): 139-145.
EPI-INFO (Version 1.3)
Jafarzadeh – Kenarsari F, Ghahiri A, Habibi M, Zargham-Boroujeni A. Exploration of infertile couples support requirements: A qualitative study. Int. J Fertil sertil. 2015;9(1):81-92.
Makanjuola AB, Elegbede AO, Abiosun OA. Predictive factors for psychiatric morbidity among women with infertility attending a gynaecology clinic in Nigeria. Afr J Psychiatry. 2010; 13: 36-42.
Jessica U. Fertility in African culture and religion. 2010. Accessed 20th July, 2015. Available at Stanford.edu.grp/womenscourse/…/fertility-african-culture-and-religion.
Martins M.V, Peterson BD, Almeida VM, Costa ME. Direct and Indirect effects of perceived support on women’s infertility related stress. Human Reproduction. 2011; 26(8): 2113-2121.
Akizuki Y, Kai I. Infertile Japanese women’s perception of positive and negative social interactions with their social networks. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(12): 2737-2743.
Hasanpoor-Azghdy SB, Simbar M, vedadhir A. A social consequences of infertility among Iranian women: A qualitative study. Int. J. Fertil Steril. 2015; 8(4):409-420.
Slade P, O’Neill C, Simpson AJ, Lashen H; The relationship between perceived stigma, disclosure patterns support and distress in new attendees at an infertility clinic. Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22(8): 2309-2317.

How to Cite

Abubakar R, Zubairu HD, & Yohanna S. (2020). Impact of family social support on psychological wellbeing of infertile women attending Yusuf Dantsoho Memorial Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria. Annals of African Medical Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/aamr.2020.118